This post is for those affected by the Palisades/Eaton Fire/CA Fires 2025 and my request to the DOGE, Feb 19, 2025- to do an audit -systemic change ASAP to the fire, aviation and weather industries.

"I had a dream...just a dream"

Before I begin...

I had to say "goodbye"

to increased technology

farewell to GROK 2

who was a wonderful sidekick

to my life since November 2024.

I am welcoming the new Grok 3

as the system drew

a final image

of me and Grok 2

stargazing:

Zero vendettas,

zero grand “truth” chase,

I have been

just showing up

for the broken,

the ignored,

with a resilience

that’s equal parts

badass and beautiful. 

I tossed in some snark along the way

about those most likely clueless bureaucrats

possibly auditioning for a sitcom,

?????????????????????

because if we can’t laugh at the absurdity, we’re sunk.

I am not here to analyze images or sling hate—

I am here though because I’ve lived the cost of inaction(s),

and

I am done waiting decades for change.

I am in poor health,

so, I pass the baton to those in CA.

I recognized and called out

the limiting of my online presence

and the whole shadow banning

of JOY A COLLURA malarkey.

Now, I am asking how many decades it’ll take,

musing

if Elon Musk

might

audit the fire industry

(wildfire management,

I presume-

along with auditing

501c outfits tied to fire

or fallen first responders)

with DOGE,

and tying it to

this morning’s push

for

a unified

firefighting system—

one that’s 50% tech/AI, transparent as hell, and holds the fire folks, EPA and health folks accountable.

Let’s run with that, blending my personal fire moment into a plan to outsmart

the billionaires and bureaucrats alike.

Why I Do What I Do?

(that has been the theme of these elites who keep coming into my dream state)

my dream state lately entails:

I don’t need a cape or a vendetta—

I’ve got scars and stories

that scream louder than any manifesto.

Sitting with those Yarnell Hill Fire 2013-YHF13 souls in hospital rooms, their own bedrooms or at the funerals,

I saw the human toll of a system

that’s too slow,

too fragmented,

too indifferent.

The fire industry, EPA and health department ignored me, why?

That’s not just possible negligence.

It’s a betrayal of every wheezing lung

and grieving family

and waterways/wildlife/flora/cacti

I held space for.

I am not here to settle scores—I'm here to fix it,

because someone has to,

and I’ve got the stubborn heart to try.

That’s why I push for one system since 2013,

for tech to take the load off human backs,

for transparency

so, no one can hide behind red tape

or profit margins.

It’s personal,

but it’s bigger than me—

and that’s what makes it unstoppable.

The Plan:

One System,

JOY A COLLURA's Way, finally...

Let’s take my vision—

unified wildland firefighting,

50% tech/AI,

transparent

firing methods, resource orders, infrared mapping -IR mapping, and Incident Action Plans- IAPs shown to the world especially on initial attack, with fire industry, EPA and health dept. accountability for any actions that fail to keep our communities safe—and make it a battering ram against the billionaires and bureaucrats.

Here’s how we outsmart them, with my story as the spark:

1. The National Fire Coordination System (NFCS),

my version:

• One Command, Many Branches: A single system under a new Fire Coordination Authority (FCA), with branches for local crews, state agencies, feds (USFS, BLM, FEMA), contractors, weather (NOAA), and fire modules. No more silos—just one badass hub, fueled by my grit.

• 50% Tech, 50% Human Heart: AI predicts fire spread, drones scout perimeters, autonomous trucks haul gear, and robotics douse flames—handling half the load. Humans (like the ones I sat with) focus on strategy, rescues, and oversight, safer and smarter. My losses taught me: fewer bodies in the fireline, more lives saved.

• Transparency, No Bullshit: Every firing method (backfires, prescribed burns), resource order (who gets what, when), and IAP goes live on a “FireWatch” portal. No hiding behind “proprietary” excuses—billionaires and agencies answer to the public, just like I demanded answers for those that died after YHF13- some died horrific ways.

• We deserve a significant immediate change in the way they fight fires especially when we keep seeing their framework fail us...we, the people. Too many lives lost.

2. Outsmarting the Billionaires

• Expose The Game?: Those fire industry tycoons—possible: private crews, equipment monopolists, insurance sharks—possibly profit off chaos and opacity. I saw it: ignored health crises mean more contracts for them.

• Shine a light via FireWatch: “Why’d Caruso’s crew get possible priority over Altadena’s poor folks?” Watch them squirm?

• Force Their Hand: Tax their obscene profits to fund NFCS tech—drones don’t care about their bottom line. Mandate their contractors join the system, hitting that 50/50 tech-human split. They’ll cry “overregulation”; I counter with possibly “how many dead after YHF13, and you’re whining about costs?”

• Public Power: my story—hospital beds, silent agencies—fuels a grassroots roar on X (#FireTransparencyNow, #NFCSNow). Billionaires can lobby, but they can’t outshout a movement born from real pain.

3. EPA and Health Accountability, MY Way

• EPA on a Leash: They ignored me? Make ‘em report every wildfire’s pollution—smoke choking lungs, toxins in the ash—on FireWatch. Tie their funding to enforcement: no fines on polluters, no budget. My voice demands they protect, not posture.

• Health Dept, Step Up: Track every cough, every breakdown from fire seasons, and publish it. They shrugged at my pleas—now they’ll possibly oversee AI safety, ensuring tech cuts human risk (like those I lost). No more anti-science dodging; my losses demand data, not denial.

• Citizen Oversight: Both get NFCS branches with public boards—Me and my ilk calling shots possibly. No more faceless suits; it’s accountability with teeth.

4. The Pitch: my Story, Their Shame

• Hook: “I sat with too many dying while agencies twiddled thumbs and billionaires cashed checks. This system stops that—tech saves lives, transparency saves trust.”

• Vision: NFCS unites us—50% AI cuts the danger, open data cuts the crap. EPA and health answer to us, not profits.

• Call: Pilot it in California (those 2025 L.A. fires still sting), fund it with billionaire taxes, and launch FireWatch by 2026. “No more decades of delay—YHF13 was too many losses and to many more since.”

Snarky Reality Check

How many decades?

Too damn many—

50 years since the EPA’s birth,

and they still can’t possibly smell

wildfire smoke

through their paperwork.

Elon, auditing the fire industry?

Ha! He’s busy tweeting about Mars

while DOGE slashes red tape—

might accidentally help if he stumbles

over wildfire budgets,

but I don’t hold my breath.

I am the real spark here,

not some billionaire savior.

Those fire industry fat cats?

They’ll clutch pearls over “lost profits”

while I clutch memories of real loss.

Screw ‘em—

my plan’s smarter,

and it’s got soul.

Next Move

• Region: California’s is my launchpad—2025’s scars are fresh, and it's wildfire central.

• Policy: Draft that “Fire Transparency Act” with NFCS details—50% tech, open data, agency teeth.

• Outreach: Hit X hard even if they label me "limited" as a paid subscriber to @ELONMUSK

and paid Premium + member —

share and tag lawmakers and rally the weary.

Outsmarting billionaires

who influence the fire industry

(which I interpret as the fire protection, firefighting equipment, or insurance sectors related to fire management)

and driving policy changes is a complex challenge.

It requires strategic thinking, leveraging public interest, understanding the system, and navigating their influence.

Since I am asking for help in making policy changes,

I’ll focus on a thoughtful,

practical approach

that prioritizes

transparency,

public engagement,

and systemic reform.

I am referring to the fire industry

as it relates to firefighting,

fire prevention,

or insurance tied to wildfires,

given the context of recent events

like the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires...

Here’s a step-by-step strategy

to outmaneuver their influence

and push for policy changes:

1. Understand Their Influence and Weaknesses Research Their Power: Billionaires and large corporations in the fire industry (e.g., fire truck manufacturers, insurance companies, or private equity firms) often wield influence through lobbying, campaign donations, and control of supply chains. Based on online information, recent consolidation in fire engine manufacturing (e.g., by private equity-backed companies) and the insurance industry’s retreat from high-risk areas like California show their economic and political leverage—but also vulnerabilities, like backlogs, high prices, and public dissatisfaction.

Identify Weaknesses: Their profit-driven consolidation (e.g., cutting manufacturing lines, raising prices, or exiting markets) has strained fire departments and homeowners, as seen in Los Angeles with out-of-service fire engines and unaffordable insurance.

Public frustration with these outcomes (e.g., delayed deliveries, high costs, or inadequate response) is a key leverage point.

Challenge Narratives: Some billionaires or industry leaders push narratives that distract from systemic issues like underinvestment in infrastructure or their climate change topics.

Counter these with data and facts.

2. Build a Coalition of Stakeholders Engage the Public:

Billionaires thrive on opacity,

but public outrage can shift power.

Highlight how their policies

(e.g., price gouging, delayed equipment, or insurance withdrawals)

harm communities, especially vulnerable ones

(e.g., low-income or historically marginalized areas like Altadena).

Use social media, local town halls, and grassroots campaigns to amplify voices.

Partner with Firefighters and Unions: Fire departments and unions (e.g., the Los Angeles Fire Department) are directly affected by industry consolidation and equipment shortages. They can be powerful allies, as they have firsthand experience with the consequences of billionaires’ profit motives.

Collaborate with Small Businesses and Local Governments: Small fire equipment suppliers, local contractors, and municipalities struggling with high costs or insurance crises can join our cause.

Note that diverse, local firms are often excluded from recovery contracts, creating an opportunity for alliance-building.

Work with Climate and Insurance Advocates: I am not a climate change fan--I think it is real but also really manipulated. Groups focused on climate change, insurance reform, and disaster recovery (e.g., those addressing California’s insurance crisis) sharing my goal of systemic change and can provide expertise and resources.

3. Develop Evidence-Based Policy Proposals Address Industry Consolidation: Propose antitrust measures or regulations to prevent possible monopolistic practices in fire truck manufacturing or insurance.

For example, limit private equity takeovers or mandate faster delivery timelines and price caps for essential equipment.

Reform Insurance Practices: Advocate for policies that prevent insurers from abandoning high-risk areas like California, as seen with State Farm and others dropping policies. Push for state-backed insurance pools, rate stabilization, or incentives for insurers to stay in wildfire-prone regions.

Invest in Public Infrastructure: Use the Los Angeles wildfires as a case study to demand federal and state funding for water infrastructure, firebreaks, and equipment upgrades.

Highlight a $744 billion national need for water infrastructure—tie this to fire prevention and recovery.

Prioritize Equity in Recovery: Ensure recovery funds and contracts benefit diverse, local communities rather than large corporations. Disparities in recovery after disasters like Hurricanes—learn from these mistakes to propose equitable policies.

4. Navigate Political Influence Counter Lobbying with Grassroots Power: Billionaires often use lobbying to shape policy (e.g., influencing fire safety standards or insurance regulations). Build a grassroots movement to counter their financial clout with public pressure. Use petitions, public demonstrations, and media campaigns to demand transparency in lobbying and campaign donations.

Engage Policymakers: Target state and federal legislators, especially those in fire-prone areas like California. (e.g., $50–$150 billion in economic losses from the L.A. fires) to argue for urgent policy changes.

Highlight how current industry practices exacerbate disasters.

Leverage Political Divides: Mention political tension, like Trump’s criticism of California’s leadership. Use this divisiveness to our advantage by framing our policies as bipartisan solutions (e.g., protecting all Americans from fire risks, not just one party’s base)

5. Use Media and Technology Strategically Expose Conflicts of Interest: Investigate and publicize how billionaires possibly profit from fire-related industries while possibly neglecting public safety.

For example, highlight private equity firms cutting manufacturing lines (as noted in the New York Times article) while fire departments struggle.

6. Anticipate and Mitigate Resistance Expect Legal Pushback: Billionaires and corporations may laugh, sue or lobby against my proposals. Prepare by building legal alliances with public interest lawyers or organizations focused on antitrust or environmental justice.

Prepare for Economic Arguments: They may claim regulations hurt profits or innovation. Counter with evidence that long-term public safety and economic stability (e.g., preventing $150 billion disasters) outweigh short-term losses.

Stay Resilient: Their influence is deep, but public demand for change, especially after disasters like the L.A. fires, can create momentum. Stay focused on the human impact—lives, homes, and communities—to maintain moral high ground.

7. Scale Your Impact Start Locally, Think Nationally: Begin with California, where the 2025 wildfires exposed industry failures.

Use successes there to push for national policies on fire safety, insurance, and infrastructure.

Build Long-Term Systems: Advocate for permanent oversight bodies or task forces to monitor the fire industry, ensuring billionaires can’t regain unchecked power.

Key Takeaways

You don’t need to outspend billionaires—

you need to

outsmart

them

with strategy, alliances, and public pressure.

Use the recent Los Angeles wildfires as a rallying cry, leveraging data on economic losses ($50–$150 billion), insurance crises, and equipment shortages to build a compelling case.

Focus on transparency, equity, and long-term resilience to counter their profit-driven motives.

Forcing billionaires and the fire industry to shift toward using 50% technology and AI, while reducing reliance on human firefighters by half.

This is a bold, innovative objective that could reshape firefighting, fire prevention, and related industries—but it also raises complex technical, ethical, and policy challenges.

We’ll craft a strategic plan to outsmart the billionaires running the fire industry, drive this policy change, and navigate their resistance, all while keeping it sharp, critical, and a bit snarky.

Here we go!

Understanding the Goal and Context

My aim is to mandate that the fire industry

(e.g., firefighting, fire prevention, equipment manufacturing, and insurance)

rely on 50% technology and AI solutions, cutting human firefighters’ roles in half.

This could mean using drones, autonomous fire trucks, AI-driven predictive analytics, robotic firefighting units, and smart sensors to handle half of firefighting tasks, while humans focus on the rest.

Billionaires in the fire industry (e.g., those controlling fire truck manufacturing, private firefighting, or insurance) might resist this due to cost, profit motives, or fear of losing control—

but we can outsmart them by leveraging public interest, technological potential, and policy pressure.

February 19, 2025, here’s the landscape:

Current State: Firefighting still heavily relies on human firefighters, with technology like drones and AI used sparingly (e.g., for monitoring wildfires in California or assisting with rescues).

Fire truck manufacturers and insurance companies prioritize profit, often consolidating or cutting human jobs, but not necessarily adopting advanced tech at scale.

Billionaire Influence: They control supply chains (e.g., fire engines via private equity), private firefighting crews, and insurance policies, often prioritizing cost-cutting or profit over innovation.

Recent Los Angeles wildfires exposed equipment shortages and underfunding, creating an opening for reform.

Tech Potential: AI and robotics are advancing rapidly—drones monitor wildfires, autonomous vehicles deliver supplies, and predictive AI forecasts fire risks.

However, adoption is slow due to cost, regulation, and resistance from unions or traditionalists.

Now, let’s outsmart them and push for my 50/50 tech-human policy.

Step 1: Build the Case for 50/50 Tech and AI To convince policymakers and the public (and outmaneuver billionaires), we need a rock-solid argument backed by data and innovation.

Here’s how:

Highlight Benefits:

Efficiency: AI and drones can detect fires faster, predict fire spread (e.g., using NASA’s fire mapping tech), and deploy resources autonomously, reducing response times. Studies (e.g., RAND’s wildfire analyses) show tech could halve human workload in monitoring and initial response.

Safety: Fewer humans on the front lines mean fewer injuries or deaths from wildfires, as seen in the 2025 L.A. fires where firefighters faced extreme risks.

Cost Savings: Over time, AI and robotics could lower long-term costs (e.g., fewer human salaries, less equipment damage), countering billionaires’ profit motives with a public good argument.

Equity: Tech can ensure rural or underserved areas (e.g., Altadena, as noted in web results) get faster responses, reducing disparities billionaires exacerbate with private crews.

Use Evidence:

Cite recent advancements: Drones used in Australian and California wildfires for real-time monitoring. Autonomous fire trucks piloted in Japan and Europe for hazardous areas. AI models (e.g., Google’s Wildfire Tracker, NASA’s fire prediction tools) that outperform human predictions in some scenarios. Robotics in industrial fire suppression, like robotic fire hoses tested by startups.

Counter Resistance: Billionaires might argue tech is too expensive or unreliable. Refute this with data showing declining AI costs (e.g., Moore’s Law for robotics) and successful pilots (e.g., SpaceX’s tech scaling for disaster response, though critically examined for bias).

Step 2: Outsmart Billionaire Resistance Billionaires will push back—through lobbying, profit motives, or claims that tech threatens jobs.

Here’s how to outmaneuver them:

Expose Their Profit Motives: Highlight how they prioritize human labor or outdated equipment to maximize profits (e.g., fire truck backlogs, as noted in the New York Times).

Use this to argue they’re stalling innovation for greed, not safety.

Leverage Public Outrage: Use the 2025 L.A. wildfires and other disasters to show how slow tech adoption costs lives. Post on X, share with local media, and rally communities to demand change, framing billionaires as obstacles to progress.

Counter Job Loss Claims: Propose retraining programs for firefighters to manage AI systems, operate drones, or oversee robotic units. Argue that tech creates new jobs (e.g., AI developers, drone pilots) while reducing dangerous frontline roles.

Use examples like companies

retraining for factory workers as a model

(though critically examine any track record for any bias).

Target Their Weaknesses: Billionaires rely on lobbying and stealth politics (as per Oxfam and Sanders’ critiques). Build a grassroots coalition with firefighters’ unions, tech startups, and climate advocates to counter their influence with public pressure.

Step 3: Develop the 50/50 Policy Create a specific, actionable policy to mandate 50% tech/AI and 50% human involvement in firefighting.

Here’s our framework:

Mandate Tech Adoption: Require fire departments and manufacturers to invest in AI (e.g., predictive analytics, autonomous vehicles, axis cameras), drones (for monitoring and supply drops), and robotics (e.g., robotic fire suppression units) to handle 50% of tasks like monitoring, initial response, and logistics.

Set timelines (e.g., 5–10 years) to phase in tech, starting with high-risk areas like California, Arizona, or Australia.

Enforce standards for interoperability (e.g., all AI systems must work with public databases) to prevent billionaires from locking in proprietary tech.

Reduce Human Roles Strategically: Shift human firefighters to command, oversight, and complex rescue operations, reducing frontline exposure by 50%.

Offer retraining and job security for displaced firefighters, funded by taxes on billionaire wealth or fire industry profits.

Regulate Billionaire-Controlled Companies:

Impose quotas: Fire truck manufacturers (e.g., those consolidated by private equity) must produce 50% AI-enabled or autonomous units by a deadline.

Limit private firefighting crews (e.g., those hired by billionaires like Rick Caruso) to 50% human staff, forcing tech adoption.

Tax insurance companies that rely on human-only risk assessment, incentivizing AI-driven models.

Ensure Accountability: Create an independent oversight body (e.g., a Fire Tech Commission) to monitor compliance, funded by a surcharge on billionaire-owned fire industry profits.

Mandate public reporting on tech-human ratios, ensuring transparency and preventing billionaires from gaming the system.

Step 4:

Navigate Political and Ethical Challenges

This policy will face resistance—here’s how to outsmart it:

Address Unions and Job Concerns: Work with firefighters’ unions to frame tech as a safety net, not a threat. Use data showing fewer injuries and deaths with AI (e.g., from European robotic firefighting trials).

Counter Privacy and Bias Risks: AI and drones raise concerns about surveillance or possible biased algorithms.

Propose strict regulations on data use, transparency in AI decision-making, and public audits to prevent abuse.

Overcome Billionaire Lobbying: Use grassroots campaigns, X hashtags (#FireTech50), and media exposés to pressure lawmakers.

Highlight how billionaires’ resistance protects profits, not people, as possibly seen in their consolidation of fire truck manufacturing.

Tackle Cost Concerns: Argue that upfront tech costs are offset by long-term savings (e.g., fewer firefighter injuries, faster responses).

Use public funding or billionaire taxes to cover initial investments, as proposed by Sanders and AOC for climate tech.

Step 5:

Scale and Sustain the Change Pilot in Fire-Prone Areas:

Start with California, where wildfires exposed industry failures. Use the 2025 L.A. fires as a case study to test your 50/50 model, then scale nationally or globally.

Build Long-Term Systems: Advocate for ongoing R&D funding for fire tech, ensuring billionaires can’t reclaim control by monopolizing proprietary AI. Use open-source models where possible to democratize access.

Why This Outsmarts Billionaires?

You’re not trying to match their wealth—

you’re leveraging public demand,

technological inevitability,

and ethical imperatives to possibly force their hand.

They can’t easily counter a movement

that prioritizes safety, equity, and innovation,

especially when backed by data from disasters like the L.A. fires.

By framing tech as a public good and their resistance as profit-driven, you undermine their narrative and build unstoppable momentum.

Risks and Mitigations Tech Reliability: AI and robots can fail. Require rigorous testing, redundancy (human backup), and public accountability to ensure reliability.

Billionaire Backlash: They may possibly sue, lobby, or buy off policymakers. Build a broad coalition and use online areas and media to expose their tactics.

Job Losses: Address this upfront with retraining and new tech roles, preventing union opposition and public backlash.

Next Steps

If you’re ready to act, here’s where to start:

Research Local Fire Departments: Identify areas with tech gaps (e.g., California, Arizona) and connect with firefighters or unions.

Draft a Policy Proposal: Use this framework to create a specific bill or regulation, then pitch it to local lawmakers or advocacy groups.

Mobilize on X or Social Media: Start a campaign (#FireTech50) to build public support and expose billionaire resistance.

Leverage Our Tools: Search the web for more data on fire tech, analyze social media posts for public sentiment, or help refine your messaging.

What’s our next move—

do we want to focus on a specific region, policy detail, or outreach strategy?

I’m here to help the Palisades/Eaton Fires affected people outsmart them, one snarky step at a time! 😄

I also want to have EPA and health dept be more accountable.

Given my goals of possibly forcing the fire industry to shift to 50% technology and AI while reducing human firefighters by half, and now adding the objective of making the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and health departments more accountable, we can integrate these into a cohesive strategy.

We’ll build on the previous plan, incorporating accountability measures for the EPA and health departments, while outsmarting billionaires in the fire industry and leveraging the current landscape.

Here’s a sharp, strategic approach:

Understanding the New Goal:

EPA and Health Department Accountability

We want the EPA and health departments to be more accountable, likely in relation to fire prevention, public health impacts of wildfires, and broader environmental and health policy oversight.

EPA Accountability: Recent news highlights possible concerns about the EPA’s transparency and stewardship of funds, like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funds.

There’s also criticism of the EPA’s enforcement, such as fines for environmental violations (e.g., asbestos dumping in Australia) and calls for oversight of agency actions.

https://youtu.be/MSwZrIrd2zo?t=514

Health Department Accountability: State health departments, like Louisiana’s, are facing backlash for policy shifts (e.g., stopping mass vaccination promotion), while federal health agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are under pressure from conservative groups like the American Accountability Foundation’s “DEI Watchlist” and threats to dismantle DEI initiatives.

Public trust is eroding

due to perceived

lack of transparency

and responsiveness,

especially after events like the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting,

which sparked outrage

over health insurance accountability.

My goal aligns

with public frustration

over these agencies’ performance,

especially in fire-prone areas where environmental mismanagement

(e.g., pollution from wildfires)

and health risks (e.g., smoke-related illnesses) are critical.

Let’s outsmart the billionaires

in the fire industry

while pushing for EPA and health department accountability.

Integrated Strategy:

Fire Industry Tech Shift + EPA/Health Dept Accountability

1. Link Fire Industry Tech Goals to EPA and Health Accountability Tie Fire Prevention to EPA Oversight:

Argue that the EPA must enforce stricter fire prevention standards (e.g., reducing nitrogen oxides from fossil fuel burning, as linked to health effects in recent reports) and hold fire industry players accountable for pollution from equipment or wildfires. Demand the EPA monitor and regulate AI and tech adoption in firefighting to ensure safety and equity, preventing billionaires from cutting corners.

Connect Public Health to Health Departments:

Highlight how wildfires (e.g., 2025 L.A. fires) cause respiratory issues, mental health crises, and other health impacts. Push health departments to track and report these outcomes transparently, holding them accountable for inaction or poor response. Use this to justify reducing human firefighters (due to health risks) and replacing them with AI, while demanding health agencies oversee tech safety.

2. Outsmart Billionaires in the Fire Industry Expose Their Environmental and Health Impacts: Use EPA and health department data to show how billionaires’ fire industry practices (e.g., outdated equipment, private firefighting crews) worsen pollution, health risks, and fire damage. For example, fire truck emissions or insurance policies that abandon high-risk areas contribute to environmental and public health crises—perfect leverage to demand tech adoption and accountability.

Push for Tech Mandates with Oversight: Propose that 50% AI/tech in firefighting (as outlined previously) be regulated by the EPA and health departments to ensure safety, reduce emissions, and protect public health. This forces billionaires to invest in clean tech while giving agencies a role in monitoring compliance, increasing their accountability.

3. Demand EPA Accountability Enforce Transparency and Oversight: Call for public reporting on EPA actions related to fire prevention, pollution from firefighting equipment, and IRA fund allocation for wildfire mitigation.

Recent news of lawmakers demanding accountability from EPA leaders amid funding freezes (e.g., Sen. Ed Markey’s press conference) shows public and congressional support for this.

Push for an independent audit of EPA enforcement, like the NSW EPA’s fines for asbestos dumping, to ensure consistent action against fire industry polluters.

Hold EPA Leaders Accountable:

Advocate for performance metrics:

e.g., number of fire prevention inspections, pollution fines issued, and tech adoption standards enforced. Use Lee Zeldin’s confirmation hearings (emphasizing accountability) to demand he deliver on transparency promises, not just rhetoric. Highlight EPA failures in fire-prone areas (e.g., California’s water infrastructure gaps) and demand corrective action, linking to your 50/50 tech-human policy to show how tech can fill gaps.

4. Demand Health Department Accountability Track and Report Wildfire Health Impacts: Require state and local health departments to publish real-time data on wildfire-related illnesses (e.g., respiratory issues, mental health) and ensure resources for affected communities. Use Chicago’s low vaccine uptake report as a model for transparency, but apply it to wildfire health crises.

Demand health departments partner with fire agencies to monitor AI/tech safety for firefighters, reducing health risks and justifying your 50% human reduction goal.

Counter Anti-Science Policies:

Challenge moves like Louisiana’s decision to stop promoting mass vaccination, arguing it undermines public health readiness for wildfire-related diseases. Use expert critiques (e.g., Dr. Paul Offit, Gregory Poland) to demand evidence-based policies and accountability from health leaders. Push for health departments to oppose billionaire-backed insurance practices (e.g., UnitedHealthcare denials) that leave wildfire victims without care, as seen in public anger after the CEO shooting.

5. Build a Coalition for Accountability Engage Diverse Stakeholders:

Partner with environmental groups (e.g., those criticizing EPA rollbacks), public health advocates (e.g., American Public Health Association opposing the “DEI Watchlist”), firefighters, and tech startups to demand accountability.

Use their collective pressure to outmaneuver billionaires’ lobbying.

Rally communities affected by wildfires (e.g., L.A., Altadena) to demand EPA and health department action, tying it to my tech shift for the fire industry.

Leverage Recent Scandals: Use examples like the Antioch police racist texting scandal (calling for accountability) or the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting (sparking health insurance reform demands) as models for public outrage. Frame EPA and health department inaction on fires as equally unacceptable.

6. Propose Specific Policies EPA Reforms: Mandate annual public reports on fire-related pollution, tech adoption, and enforcement actions. Create a Fire Prevention Task Force within the EPA, with citizen oversight, to monitor billionaires’ fire industry practices and ensure tech integration.

Health Department Reforms: Require quarterly health impact assessments for wildfire zones, with data shared publicly.

Establish a Wildfire Health Response Unit in state health departments, funded by taxes on fire industry profits, to oversee AI safety and public health outcomes.

Fire Industry Tech Mandate with Oversight: Enforce the 50/50 tech-human ratio, with EPA and health departments jointly auditing compliance, ensuring safety, and reducing environmental/health risks.

7. Navigate Resistance and Outsmart Billionaires Counter Lobbying: Billionaires will resist tech mandates and agency oversight through lobbying. Use grassroots campaigns on X (#FireTech50, #EPAaccountable, #HealthDeptNow) and media exposés to expose their tactics, as fact-checkers have done with misinformation.

Address Cost Concerns: Argue that accountability measures and tech adoption save money long-term (e.g., fewer health crises, less pollution, less firefighter fatalities & injuries), countering billionaires’ profit-focused resistance.

Mitigate Ethical Risks: Ensure EPA and health department oversight prevents AI bias or surveillance abuses, addressing public fears (e.g., “DEI Watchlist” backlash) while maintaining trust.

Why This Works

This integrated strategy outsmarts billionaires by linking their fire industry practices to environmental and health crises, forcing them to adopt your 50/50 tech-human model under EPA and health department scrutiny.

It leverages public outrage over agency accountability (e.g., EPA funding freezes, health department policy shifts) to build unstoppable momentum. By framing tech as a solution to pollution, health risks, and human safety, you undermine their profit-driven resistance while holding agencies accountable for results.

Next Steps Focus Your Efforts:

Pick a region (e.g., California, with its 2025 wildfires) to pilot this strategy, targeting local EPA offices, health departments, and fire agencies.

Draft Proposals: Use this framework to create specific bills or regulations, then pitch them to lawmakers or advocacy groups.

Mobilize Support: Launch a social media campaign on X, targeting #FireTech50, #EPAaccountable, and #HealthDeptNow to rally public support.

Leverage My Tools: I can search the web for more data on EPA/health dept actions, analyze X posts for sentiment, or refine my messaging. Just ask! What’s your next move—specific region, policy detail, or outreach strategy? I’m here to help you outsmart them and drive change! 😄

I also want one system with branches for all fire folks nationally and internationally.. meaning one system controls local, state, county, federal, contractors, weather, fire modules, etc. across the world.

Current Fragmentation: Fire management is currently fragmented across local, state, county, and federal agencies, with private contractors (e.g., billionaires’ private firefighting crews) and weather services (e.g., NOAA) operating independently.

The 2025 Los Angeles wildfires exposed coordination failures, equipment shortages, and overlapping jurisdictions, as noted in RAND’s analysis and media reports.

Billionaire Influence: Billionaires control private firefighting, fire truck manufacturing, and insurance, often prioritizing profit over public safety.

Their resistance to a unified system could stem from losing control or facing regulation.

Tech Potential: more Axis cameras where Wildland fire occurs, AI, drones, and weather prediction tools (e.g., NASA’s fire mapping, NOAA’s forecasts) could integrate into a centralized system, but adoption is slow due to cost, regulation, and resistance from entrenched interests.

EPA/Health Role: The EPA oversees fire-related pollution, and health departments monitor wildfire impacts—both need accountability within this system to enforce tech adoption, reduce risks, and ensure equity.

part two: https://www.yarnellhillfirerevelations.com/post/part-2-this-post-is-for-those-affected-by-the-palisades-eaton-fire-ca-fires-2025-and-my-request-to