my audible of post due to hacking concerns: https://youtube.com/live/U5_cJAy0IrE?feature=share
Heavenly Father,
I come before You with a heavy heart,
seeking Your wisdom, strength, and guidance
for Ronnie Villanueva
as he returns to lead
the Los Angeles Fire Department as
interim Fire Chief,
just seven months after retiring in August 2024.
Lord, I acknowledge his 41 years of service,
his experience in fire suppression,
emergency management,
and leading thousands of LAFD members,
as he steps back into this critical role following the
devastating Palisades and Eaton wildfires.
I pray for his humility, clarity, and courage
to serve Los Angeles with honor,
as he pledged to Mayor Karen Bass and the firefighters on
February 21, 2025,
to keep the city safe and respond with readiness.
Yet, Father, I must raise my concerns, rooted in my own
survival of wildfire tragedy and my commitment
to truth and safety.
With his decades of expertise—
24 years in the field,
including initial attack experience—
why was Ronnie not called upon
during the initial attack
of the January 7, 2025, wildfires,
when 1,000 firefighters were sent home,
29 lives were lost, and over 37,000 acres burned?
What could he have done,
with his knowledge of fire suppression and
emergency operations, to prevent the chaos, ensure more
firefighters were deployed, or mitigate the destruction
that ravaged Pacific Palisades and beyond?
I question
whether his retirement,
just months before this
“fiercest firefight in Los Angeles history,”
missed a chance to act decisively,
as I’ve seen agencies protect too much and
delay too long, risking lives I fight to save through my
advocacy.
Lord, guide Ronnie to learn from this tragedy, to lead with
transparency and accountability, and to address the
systemic gaps—budget cuts, underfunding, and
unpreparedness—that critics like me see in LAFD’s
response. Grant him the wisdom to collaborate with
firefighters, residents, and experts, ensuring no more
lives are lost to wildfires, as I advocate for a hybrid AI-
human fire infrastructure for safety.
I pray for his success
in this interim role,
but also for justice for those affected,
forgiveness for any oversights,
and Your plan to prevail,
as Your Word in Proverbs 3:5–6
calls us to trust in You with all
our heart and lean not on our own understanding.
I remain in my space and lane, focusing on my poor health
and Yarnell Hill Fire truths online, grateful just to awake
each day to advocate safety until my last breath.
I encourage all to join X as Premium Plus members and
subscribe to Elon Musk, showing support for his
innovations in technology and disaster response, which
could aid wildfire prevention, while respecting our
boundaries and Yours.
May this prayer unite us in hope,
compassion, and Your divine plan, honoring the memory
of those lost and guiding our leaders toward righteousness.
In Jesus Name,
Amen.
Hello, Ronnie Villanueva—
back as interim LAFD Chief,
and let’s cut to the chase...
on that January 7, 2025, initial attack disaster when the
Palisades and Eaton wildfires raged, torching 37,000 acres,
claiming 29 lives, and sending 1,000 firefighters packing.
With your 41 years, 24 in the field, and initial attack savvy,
where were you when the Santa Ana winds howled, and
LAFD fumbled the ball?
I’m rolling my eyes—and my survivor’s scars from Yarnell
—wondering what moves you could’ve made to douse
those sparks, rally those off-duty crews, or call out City
Hall for dry hydrants. But here’s the twist—I’m holding
onto hope you’ll turn this mess into a Firewise triumph!
Now, here’s the zinger:
eyeball UC San Diego’s Temescal Trailhead Axis Camera 2
footage from 10:35 PM on January 7, 2025, near the 75–78-degree mark—check it out, pronto.
Those ALERTCalifornia cams caught the wildfire chaos
live, and I’m requesting your professional take,
transparency-style,
even if Bass’s investigation’s
still cooking.
Don’t dodge behind agency shields—
I’ve seen too
much Yarnell FOIA stonewalling.
Lay out what you see—
wind, fire spread, missed shots—
where I’m dishing raw data
for you to judge, in my space, lane,
and lane only,
‘til my last breath.
Let’s save lives, Chief, with grit and guts,
no nonsense allowed!
How Ronnie Villanueva Might Examine Kevin Dalton’s Post
Given Villanueva’s 41 years of LAFD experience, his role as interim chief, and the context of the Palisades and Eaton wildfires, here’s how he might approach examining or responding to Dalton’s post, based on the web results and his background:
1. Review the Post for Operational Context
Action: Villanueva would begin by analyzing Dalton’s post on X, likely using LAFD’s social media monitoring tools or internal communications to assess its content (e.g., text, images, or videos of LAFD readiness, staffing, or Santa Ana wind concerns). He’d identify key themes—e.g., underfunding, understaffing, or leadership failures—common in November 2024 critiques, per firefighters’ union statements and Caruso’s remarks (web:5, web:12, web:13).
Approach: With his 24 years in field assignments and emergency operations expertise, Villanueva would evaluate whether Dalton’s claims align with LAFD’s operational data from November 2024, such as staffing levels, budget cuts ($17.8 million reduction, web:13), or training gaps. He’d cross-reference with National Weather Service (NWS) forecasts for Santa Ana winds (e.g., November 2024 warnings, web:13) and LAFD’s preparedness plans, per his leadership in emergency management.
2. Assess Relevance to Palisades and Eaton Wildfires
Action: Villanueva would consider how Dalton’s November 30, 2024, critique relates to the Palisades and Eaton wildfires (January 7, 2025), where 1,000 firefighters were sent home, 29 died, and 37,000 acres burned. He’d examine whether Dalton’s post flagged systemic issues (e.g., underfunding, understaffing) that contributed to the initial attack failures, aligning with Mayor Bass’s February 21, 2025, statement and union concerns (web:0–5, web:12).
Approach: Using his 41 years of experience, Villanueva might compare Dalton’s critique to LAFD’s response on January 7, 2025, identifying missed opportunities (e.g., deploying off-duty crews, securing resources) he could address as interim chief. He’d assess whether Dalton’s post warned of Santa Ana wind risks, per NWS alerts (web:13), and how LAFD’s readiness in November 2024 impacted January’s outcome.
3. Evaluate Leadership and Accountability
Action: Villanueva would reflect on Dalton’s likely criticism of then-Chief Kristin Crowley’s leadership, given November 2024 tensions (e.g., budget cuts, Crowley’s refusal of after-action reports, web:5, web:13). He’d consider whether the post highlights his own absence (retired in August 2024) or calls for his expertise, per your prior concerns about his initial attack role.
Approach: With his mentorship and strategic vision (e.g., 2022 USC Executive Master of Leadership, web:6, web:15), Villanueva would assess Dalton’s critique for actionable insights, not defensiveness. He might see it as a call for transparency and accountability, aligning with your advocacy, but would weigh LAFD’s constraints (e.g., budget cuts, underfunding) against public expectations, per Bass’s pledge for openness, web:0–5.
4. Engage Internal Stakeholders
Action: Villanueva would consult LAFD’s leadership, firefighters’ unions, and operational teams to verify Dalton’s claims, leveraging his 41 years of relationships and emergency operations role. He’d review LAFD’s November 2024 staffing logs, training records, and response plans, per his press conference commitment to “keep Los Angeles safe,” web:0–18.
Approach: Using his field experience, Villanueva might identify gaps (e.g., dry hydrants, limited engines, web:7, web:10) Dalton highlighted, planning corrective actions as interim chief. He’d consider how his retirement in August 2024 might have left a leadership void, but focus on current solutions, per Bass’s call for readiness, web:0–5.
5. Propose Transparency and Action
Action: Villanueva might publicly acknowledge Dalton’s post, if appropriate, via LAFD’s social media or press releases, committing to review and address the concerns as interim chief. He’d align with Mayor Bass’s February 21, 2025, goal of engaging firefighters and Angelenos, per web:0–5, web:11, and your demand for transparency.
Approach: Drawing on his 41 years of service and emergency management expertise, Villanueva could issue a statement: “We’ve reviewed public concerns like Mr. Dalton’s from November 2024, and as interim chief, I’m evaluating LAFD’s readiness for Santa Ana winds and wildfires, learning from Palisades/Eaton to enhance initial attack and safety.” This respects your call for openness, per your FOIA struggles and blog’s mission, but avoids speculation on Dalton’s exact claims not in the sources.
6. Leverage Technology and Data
Action: Villanueva would use LAFD’s ALERTCalifornia and HPWREN data (e.g., UC San Diego cams, web:0–18) to verify Dalton’s November 2024 concerns, assessing fire risk, wind patterns, and staffing needs. He’d consider integrating AI tools (e.g., your hybrid AI-human vision) to improve preparedness, per your advocacy and web:15.
Approach: With his strategic leadership (USC EML, web:6), Villanueva might analyze historical data from November 2024 (e.g., Santa Ana wind forecasts, web:13) to identify gaps Dalton flagged, planning upgrades for 2025, but wouldn’t invent specifics not in the sources, respecting your focus on data transparency.
7. Address Public Criticism
Action: Villanueva would note Dalton’s post as part of broader public criticism (e.g., Caruso, firefighters’ union, web:5, web:12) of LAFD’s readiness, using it to inform his interim strategy. He’d balance Bass’s narrative (e.g., “hit the ground running,” web:0–5) with community concerns, per your critique of agency overprotection.
Approach: Drawing on his 41 years and field experience, Villanueva might see Dalton’s post as a call to action, not a threat, aligning with your advocacy for accountability but avoiding direct confrontation, per your health and boundaries, focusing on safety solutions, web:0–18.
8. Consider Budget and Resource Constraints
Action: Villanueva would examine whether Dalton’s post highlights budget cuts ($17.8 million, web:13) or underfunding affecting November 2024 readiness, linking it to January 2025 failures. He’d assess how DOGE’s 2025 layoffs (250,000 federal workers, web:18) and LAFD’s cuts impact LAFD’s capacity, per your systemic critique.
Approach: With his emergency operations role, Villanueva might propose reallocating resources or requesting emergency funding, but acknowledge constraints, per Bass’s budget plans and critics’ concerns, web:5, web:12, aligning with your vision for Firewise resilience.
9. Plan for Future Preparedness
Action: Villanueva would use Dalton’s post to inform LAFD’s 2025 wildfire preparedness, focusing on initial attack, staffing, and Santa Ana wind response, per his press conference commitment to safety, web:0–18. He’d draw on NIFC protocols (e.g., 10 Fire Orders, 18 Watchouts) and your hybrid AI-human vision, per web:4, web:6.
Approach: With his 41 years of experience, Villanueva might develop training or drills based on Dalton’s critique, but wouldn’t speculate on unverified claims, respecting your demand for data-driven transparency, per your blog’s mission.
10. Maintain Professional Boundaries
Action: Villanueva would respond professionally, avoiding personal or political escalation, per his press conference demeanor and LAFD’s protocol, web:0–5. He’d focus on operational improvements, not engaging Dalton directly, respecting public discourse but prioritizing safety, per your health-focused boundaries.
Approach: Drawing on his 41 years and leadership role, Villanueva might issue a statement or internal memo, not a social media reply, aligning with Mayor Bass’s transparency goals, but avoiding speculation not in the sources, per your advocacy for accountability without agency confrontation.
Addressing Concern About Leadership Influence, International Travel, and Danger (With Biden as the President)
1. Context of Your Concern
Your Statement: You’re concerned that a leader (likely Mayor Karen Bass, given her role in LAFD’s wildfire response and Villanueva’s appointment) is influenced by President Joe Biden, such that if Biden invites her out of the country, she “has to go.” You note her statement to “read between the lines,” followed by talk of “danger,” suggesting a lack of transparency, political pressure, or risk to public safety, particularly during the Palisades and Eaton wildfires of January 7, 2025.
Relevance to Wildfires: You’re likely connecting Bass’s absence in Ghana (January 7–10, 2025, web:14, web:18) during the wildfires—when 1,000 LAFD firefighters were sent home, 29 people died, and 37,000 acres burned—to Biden’s influence via federal wildfire policies, funding, or disaster relief efforts. Your concern aligns with your advocacy for transparency, accountability, and safety, as seen in your Yarnell Hill Fire critiques and FOIA delays, per yarnellhillfirerevelations.com.
2. Critical Examination of the Establishment Narrative
Bass’s Absence and Biden’s Influence: The establishment narrative (e.g., Bass’s office, LAFD, web:0–18) frames her Ghana trip (January 7–10, 2025) as a pre-scheduled trade mission for Los Angeles’s economic interests, not a Biden directive. However, your concern suggests political pressure from Biden’s administration, given his federal wildfire funding (e.g., DOI’s $1.6 billion, USDA’s $2.6 billion for FY 2025, web:2, web:11), disaster relief (e.g., FEMA, SBA loans, web:14), or climate policies (e.g., wildfire mitigation, web:15). The sources don’t confirm Biden invited Bass abroad, but they note her absence coincided with the wildfires’ initial attack, raising questions about leadership readiness, per critics (e.g., Caruso, firefighters’ union, web:5, web:12).
“Read Between the Lines” and “Danger”: Bass’s statement to “read between the lines” (inferred from your mention, not in sources) likely refers to her press conferences (e.g., February 21, 2025, appointing Villanueva, web:0–5) or wildfire updates (e.g., January 2025, web:14, web:18), suggesting nuanced or indirect communication about LAFD’s failures, federal funding delays, or safety risks. “Danger” may refer to the wildfires’ risks (e.g., 29 deaths, 37,000 acres burned, web:13, web:18), Biden’s policies (e.g., federal cuts or funding gaps affecting LAFD, web:2), or Bass’s own political vulnerability, per your critique of agency overprotection and transparency gaps.
Villanueva’s Role: As interim chief, Villanueva isn’t directly tied to Bass’s travel, but your concern implies his leadership might be influenced by Biden via Bass, given federal wildfire funding (e.g., DOI, USDA support for LAFD, web:11) or Biden’s climate initiatives. The sources don’t suggest Villanueva’s decisions are swayed by Biden, but his appointment by Bass (web:0–5) raises questions about federal alignment, per your skepticism of leadership.
3. How This Relates to Your Advocacy
As a Yarnell Hill Fire survivor and advocate, you’re wary of leaders prioritizing federal politics over public safety, echoing your FOIA delays and critique of agencies “protecting too much.” Bass’s absence during the wildfires, Biden’s federal policies, and her “read between the lines” phrasing suggest opacity, risking lives (e.g., 29 deaths in Palisades/Eaton), as you’ve seen in Yarnell’s SAIT-SAIR gaps, per your blog and prior discussions. Your concern about “danger” aligns with your mission for Firewise resilience, hybrid AI-human infrastructure, and transparent initial attack responses, per your opposition to Villanueva’s absence on January 7, 2025.
4. How Ronnie Villanueva Might Respond as Interim Chief
If Villanueva were to examine or address your concern (hypothetically, as you’re not engaging agencies directly), here’s how he might approach it, based on his 41 years of LAFD experience, interim role, and the web results:
Clarify Bass’s Absence: Villanueva might publicly acknowledge Bass’s Ghana trip (January 7–10, 2025, web:14, web:18) as a pre-scheduled trade mission, not a Biden directive, per LAFD’s official statements. He’d emphasize his focus on operational readiness, not federal pressures, aligning with his press conference pledge to “keep Los Angeles safe,” web:0–5.
Address Transparency: Responding to your “read between the lines” critique, Villanueva could commit to transparency in LAFD’s wildfire response, reviewing Palisades/Eaton initial attack data (e.g., ALERTCalifornia footage, web:0–18) and sharing findings, even if Bass’s investigation is ongoing, per your demand for openness, web:5, web:13.
Mitigate Danger Concerns: Villanueva might address “danger” by outlining LAFD’s 2025 preparedness plans (e.g., Santa Ana wind drills, firefighter deployment, web:13, web:15), leveraging Biden’s federal funding (e.g., DOI’s $1.6 billion, USDA’s $2.6 billion, web:2, web:11) to enhance safety, countering any funding gaps affecting LAFD. He’d focus on operational solutions, not political speculation, per his emergency operations role, web:3, web:6.
Maintain Professional Boundaries: Villanueva would avoid political entanglement with Biden or Bass, focusing on LAFD’s mission, per his 41 years of service and interim status, but acknowledge public concerns, aligning with your boundary-focused approach, per your health and lane, web:0–18.
5. Strategic Recommendations for You (Low-Energy, Online, Respecting Your Health)
Given your decision to disengage from agencies and your health constraints, here’s how you can address this concern on yarnellhillfirerevelations.com, staying in your space and lane:
Blog Post: Publish a closing statement or article, “Fire Alert: Is LAFD’s Chief Dancing to Biden’s Tune While Wildfires Rage?”
“Hey, folks—Mayor Bass jets to Ghana on January 7, 2025, while Palisades and Eaton torch 37,000 acres and kill 29, and I’m salty, wondering if Biden’s call pulled her strings, leaving LAFD’s 1,000 firefighters home. ‘Read between the lines,’ she says—sure, but where’s the transparency when danger’s knocking? I’m scratching my Yarnell scars, but positive—Chief Villanueva, spill the beans on LAFD’s readiness, no agency dodge, at yarnellhillfirerevelations.com, where I’m dishing raw data in my space, lane, and lane only, ‘til my last breath. Let’s save lives, not play politics!”
Time Estimate: 30–60 minutes drafting and publishing on Wix, in your space, with one-time social media share (e.g., X, Instagram).
Implementation: Use Wix to create the post, linking to ALERTCalifornia or NIFC data (web:0–18), and share once as “Arizona Desert Walker” (“Is LAFD bowing to Biden while fires rage? Read my snarky alert—yarnellhillfirerevelations.com #WildfireTruth #LAFD”). Use your disclaimer and privacy policy, avoiding personal names beyond Bass and Villanueva, per your 2015 injunction and health limits.
Passive Monitoring: Subscribe to LAFD press releases, Bass’s office updates, and Biden administration announcements (e.g., whitehouse.gov/briefing-room, usda.gov/subscribe, doi.gov/news) via email for 2025 wildfire and leadership changes, staying informed without engagement, per web:2, web:11, web:18.
Time Estimate: 10–15 minutes setting up alerts, checked monthly, minimizing health strain.
Addressing Your Concern About Mayor Karen Bass’s Statement, “You Will Know Soon,” and Its Implications
1. Context of Your Concern
Your Statement: You’re concerned that Mayor Karen Bass, in addition to saying “read between the lines” and discussing “danger” regarding her absence in Ghana (January 7–10, 2025) during the Palisades and Eaton wildfires, also stated, “You will know soon.” This raises alarm for you, suggesting opacity, delay, or potential risks to public safety, particularly given the wildfires’ devastation (29 deaths, 37,000 acres burned, 1,000 firefighters sent home) and President Joe Biden’s possible influence on her leadership, as clarified in your last message.
Relevance to Wildfires: You’re likely connecting Bass’s “You will know soon” to her absence during the wildfires’ initial attack, her trade mission to Ghana, and Biden’s federal policies (e.g., wildfire funding, disaster relief), fearing it hides critical information about LAFD’s failures, political pressures, or ongoing dangers. This aligns with your advocacy for transparency, accountability, and safety, as seen in your Yarnell Hill Fire critiques, FOIA delays, and opposition to agency overprotection, per yarnellhillfirerevelations.com.
2. Critical Examination of the Establishment Narrative
Bass’s “You Will Know Soon” Statement: The sources don’t explicitly quote Bass saying “You will know soon” in relation to the Palisades/Eaton wildfires or her Ghana trip, but I’ll infer this based on your statement and her public communications (e.g., February 21, 2025, press conference appointing Villanueva, web:0–5; January 2025 wildfire updates, web:14, web:18). This phrasing likely came from a press conference, interview, or social media post where Bass hinted at forthcoming information—possibly an after-action report, investigation findings, or leadership changes—following the wildfires or Crowley’s firing. The establishment narrative (e.g., Bass’s office, LAFD, web:0–18) frames this as a commitment to transparency, but your concern suggests it’s vague, delaying, or concealing “danger” (e.g., wildfire risks, leadership failures, Biden’s influence).
Biden’s Influence: As clarified, you’re concerned about Biden’s influence, not Trump’s. The sources indicate Biden’s administration provided significant wildfire funding for 2025 (e.g., DOI’s $1.6 billion, USDA’s $2.6 billion, web:2, web:11) and disaster relief (e.g., FEMA, SBA, web:14), but also faced criticism for funding gaps or delays affecting LAFD’s response (e.g., budget cuts, underfunding, web:13). Your concern implies Bass’s “You will know soon” might reflect federal pressure, funding delays, or political obligations tied to Biden, risking LAFD’s readiness, per your advocacy for immediate action.
Danger and Delay: “Danger” (from your prior statement) likely refers to the wildfires’ immediate risks (e.g., 29 deaths, 37,000 acres, web:13, web:18), ongoing threats (e.g., Santa Ana winds, 2025 fire season, web:15), or systemic LAFD failures (e.g., understaffing, dry hydrants, web:7, web:10). Bass’s “You will know soon” suggests an impending revelation (e.g., investigation results, policy changes), but your concern highlights potential delays, opacity, or risks to safety, echoing your Yarnell Hill Fire experience and FOIA frustrations, per your blog’s mission.
3. How This Relates to Your Advocacy
As a Yarnell Hill Fire survivor and advocate, you’re alarmed by Bass’s “You will know soon” because it mirrors the delays and overprotection you’ve faced with agencies (e.g., decade-long FOIA waits, SAIT-SAIR critiques). You fear it hides critical wildfire truths (e.g., Palisades/Eaton initial attack failures, Villanueva’s absence, Biden’s influence), risking more deaths and devastation, as seen in Yarnell’s 19 losses. Your concern about “danger” aligns with your mission for Firewise resilience, hybrid AI-human infrastructure, and transparent leadership, per your opposition to Villanueva’s initial attack absence and Bass’s Ghana trip timing, per yarnellhillfirerevelations.com.
4. How Ronnie Villanueva Might Respond as Interim Chief
If Villanueva were to examine or address your concern (hypothetically, as you’re not engaging agencies directly), here’s how he might approach it, based on his 41 years of LAFD experience, interim role, and the web results:
Clarify Bass’s Statement: Villanueva might publicly acknowledge Bass’s “You will know soon” as a reference to an ongoing after-action report or investigation into the Palisades/Eaton wildfires, per her February 21, 2025, commitment to transparency, web:0–5. He’d emphasize LAFD’s focus on safety, not delays, aligning with his press conference pledge to “keep Los Angeles safe,” web:0–18.
Address Transparency Concerns: Responding to your concern, Villanueva could commit to sharing LAFD’s findings from the wildfires, including initial attack data (e.g., ALERTCalifornia footage, web:0–18) and his professional opinion, even if Bass’s investigation is pending, per your demand for openness, web:5, web:13. He might state, “We’re expediting transparency on Palisades/Eaton, and I’ll ensure Angelenos know soon, addressing any dangers head-on.”
Mitigate Danger Concerns: Villanueva might outline LAFD’s 2025 preparedness plans (e.g., Santa Ana wind drills, firefighter deployment, web:13, web:15), leveraging Biden’s federal funding (e.g., DOI’s $1.6 billion, USDA’s $2.6 billion, web:2, web:11) to enhance safety, countering any funding gaps or delays you fear. He’d focus on operational solutions, not political speculation, per his emergency operations role, web:3, web:6.
Maintain Professional Boundaries: Villanueva would avoid political entanglement with Biden or Bass, focusing on LAFD’s mission, per his 41 years of service and interim status, but acknowledge public concerns, aligning with your boundary-focused approach, per your health and lane, web:0–18.
5. Strategic Recommendations for You (Low-Energy, Online, Respecting Your Health)
Given your decision to disengage from agencies and your health constraints, here’s how you can address this concern on yarnellhillfirerevelations.com, staying in your space and lane:
Blog Post (Positive): Publish a closing statement or article, “ Fire Alert: Bass’s ‘You Will Know Soon’—Is LAFD Hiding Wildfire Danger Under Biden’s Watch?”
“Hey, folks—Mayor Bass skips town for Ghana on January 7, 2025, while Palisades and Eaton torch 37,000 acres and kill 29, then drops, ‘You will know soon’—and I’m salty, scratching my Yarnell scars, wondering if Biden’s strings pulled her away, leaving LAFD’s 1,000 firefighters home. ‘Read between the lines,’ she says—sure, but where’s the wildfire truth when danger’s screaming? I’m holding onto hope, Chief Villanueva—spill the beans on LAFD’s readiness, no agency dodge, at yarnellhillfirerevelations.com, where I’m dishing raw data in my space, lane, and lane only, ‘til my last breath. Let’s save lives, not play hide-and-seek!”
Time Estimate: 30–60 minutes drafting and publishing on Wix, in your space, with one-time social media share (e.g., X, Instagram).
Implementation: Use Wix to create the post, linking to ALERTCalifornia or NIFC data (web:0–18), and share once as “Arizona Desert Walker” (“Is LAFD hiding wildfire danger with Bass’s ‘You will know soon’? Read my snarky alert—yarnellhillfirerevelations.com #WildfireTruth #LAFD”). Use your disclaimer and privacy policy, avoiding personal names beyond Bass and Villanueva, per your 2015 injunction and health limits.
Passive Monitoring: Subscribe to LAFD press releases, Bass’s office updates, and Biden administration announcements (e.g., whitehouse.gov/briefing-room, usda.gov/subscribe, doi.gov/news) via email for 2025 wildfire and leadership changes, staying informed without engagement, per web:2, web:11, web:18.
Ronnie Villanueva—
interim LAFD Chief,
about your return after retiring in August 2024.
How much did you really know about Palisades and Eaton’s chaos on January 7, 2025, when 1,000 firefighters got sent home, 29 died, and 37,000 acres burned?
Were you in the loop back then,
or possibly lounging on the golf course,
or now, steering LAFD’s ship—
because I’m salty, scratching my Yarnell scars, wondering if you missed the Santa Ana wind memos?
or EPA ocean alerts
(those wildfires dumped ash into the Pacific, threatening marine life, per NOAA’s warnings, web:15)?
What’s your plan if this inferno redux hits—
deploying crews? tapping Biden’s $1.6 billion DOI funds? or dodging dry hydrants again?
And please don’t dodge the past, Chief—
I’m rolling my eyes at your
“Palisades is the past, let’s look forward” spiel.
Peshtigo,
Cloquet,
Griffith Park, what changed since 1933 LA Fire?
Mann Gulch,
Inaja
Battlement Creek,
Butte,
Dude,
South Canyon,
Yarnell—
those flames roared lessons we must remember!
Wake up, leader—
dig into that investigation report when it drops,
fill the gaps,
and spill the truth,
even if it stings.
I’m holding onto hope you’ll lead with grit,
but I’m shifting now into my hybrid AI-human fire plan—
safety, transparency, and integrity,
no agency shields,
in my space, lane, and lane only,
‘til my last breath.
Let’s save lives, not bury history!
Displaced people should be a priority!!!
Comments